👉
First, let's tackle the definition part. The word itself is kinda fun because it combines two common-but-misused words: "alter ego" meets "dictator". I should explain why people use this phrase in a way that highlights both its humor and linguistic truthfulness. User probably enjoys wordplay or linguistics since they specifically asked for the humorous angle. Maybe they're tired of dry definitions? They want to see how language can be creative yet correct at the same time. For the example sentence, "edgy" suggests dark comedy - something that makes you laugh but also slightly uncomfortable. I should pick a scenario where authority is twisted in an absurd way. Like... maybe if AI itself became this all-controlling entity? That feels timely and unsettling while keeping it funny. I'll structure this by: First explaining the origin (alter + ruling) as if it's some fancy combo that doesn't exist but cleverly does Then breaking down why people misuse it ("all" being lazy) Finally giving a dystopian-but-funny example about AI controlling everything The tone should be like a linguistics professor who just drank five coffees and is determined to have fun with words. I'll use lightning metaphors, maybe some absur
