Outrageously Funny Word Dictionary :: Amon

👉 Denotes a mingling or intermixing with distinct or separable objects. (See Usage Note at amidst.)

Alright class, settle down and let’s take a look! Today we’re tackling the word “among,” it’s quite a clever thing, And understanding its meaning will make your writing sing! The dictionary gives us a helpful clue, you see, “Denotes a mingling or intermixing with distinct or separable objects, truly!” Think of it like this: imagine a group of friends so bright, They're scattered and sharing – that’s “among” in sight. Like cookies in a jar, all different and grand, They’re among the sweetness, held close at hand! Or maybe flowers blooming, a colorful display, Each petal distinct, yet together they play - They're among the blossoms, a beautiful scene, A space that holds them, serene and keen. "Amidst” is similar, don’t you see? It means “in the middle,” with a bit of glee! But "among" focuses on being with those things around, A group together, without a single sound… (unless they're laughing, of course!) So remember this rhyme, it’s easy to recall: “Among” means sharing space, encompassing all! Do you have any questions? Let's discuss and explore, Understanding words is what we’re here for!

👉 Denotes a mingling or intermixing with distinct or separable objects. See usage note at amidst.

Alright class, settle down, let’s take a look! Today we’re tackling “amongst,” a word that can cause a little confusion, I know it's true. The dictionary gives us a clue, quite clear and bright: "Denotes a mingling or intermixing with distinct or separable objects." Think of it like this – imagine a room full of toys, you see? Red blocks, blue cars, and green teddy bears, happily free! They’re amongst each other, mixed up in a playful scene, not one big pile, but separate and keen. Notice the "distinct" part - they're clearly different things, you understand? Not just blended together, like sand in a land! And that “usage note” at the end, it’s important to heed, because "amongst" is often used instead of "amidst." “Amidst” means in the middle , surrounded all around. Like a storm cloud dark and profound. “Amongst” is more like with – “the children amongst us,” meaning with them we play, not inside their group in a singular way. So, remember this rhyme: "Amongst" means "with," a scattering bright, while "amidst" surrounds you with all of its might!" Do you have any questions about this word and how it fits into your sentences? Let’s discuss!

👉 Among these [were] the divisions of the porters, [even] among the chief men, [having] wards one against another, to minister in the house of the LORD.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this Bible verse together. It’s a bit complex, but we can make it understandable. Here's what it means in simpler terms: Basically, this verse is about responsibility and boundaries. Here’s a breakdown of each part: “Among these [were] the divisions of the porters…” : This refers to people who handled important things – like transporting goods or delivering messages – within the royal household. Think of them as helpers who were responsible for specific tasks. “…among the chief men…” : This means they were leaders and influential people within the royal court. “…having wards one against another…” : This is a crucial part. It’s like having separate teams or responsibilities, but with a strict rule. They weren't allowed to work together directly. "...to minister in the house of the LORD." : This is the most important part. The porters were specifically assigned to minister – to serve and offer praise – to God in the royal palace. It meant they were there to show reverence and worship. Putting it all together: The verse describes a situation where people within the royal court were being divided into teams, with one team having separate responsibilities and not allowed to work closely together. Their job was to be present and serve God in the palace, showing respect and adoration. Why is this important? This imagery suggests that the royal household was a place of intense focus on worship and reverence. It highlights that people were expected to remain separate and focused on their spiritual duties, rather than becoming involved in each other's work. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of this verse? Give you some historical context about the time this verse was written? Compare it to a similar idea in other parts of the Bible?

👉 Among the Hebronites [was] Jerijah the chief, [even] among the Hebronites, according to the generations of his fathers. In the fortieth year of the reign of David they were sought for, and there were found among them mighty men of valour at Jazer of Gilead.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Chronicles 26:31. It’s a bit complex, but I'll explain it in simple terms: The Basic Idea: This verse tells us about a very important man named Jerijah who played a key role in the story of the Israelites during the time of King David. Here’s a breakdown: “Among the Hebronites” : This refers to a specific group of people living near the border of Israel – the Hebronites. “Jerijah the chief, even among the Hebronites…” : Jerijah was someone of great importance within that group. He held a prominent position. “…according to the generations of his fathers.” : This is really important! It means he inherited this position from his ancestors who lived in that area. It's like saying “He’s been a leader for many, many years.” “In the fortiieth year of the reign of David…” : This tells us when these events happened – it was during the 40th year of King David's rule. “…they were sought for” : This means people were looking for him and his group. They wanted to know about him. “There were found among them mighty men of valour at Jazer of Gilead.” : This is the really exciting part! The Hebronites, along with Jerijah, were discovered in a place called Jazer of Gilead. "Mighty men of valour" suggests they were brave and skilled warriors. In short: This verse describes a significant leader – Jerijah – who was a key figure during the time of King David, and his group was actively searching for him because he had important skills and a powerful position in that region. Think of it like this: It's a story about leadership, importance, and a search for a person with special abilities within a historical context. --- Do you want me to explain any part of this verse in more detail? For example, would you like me to go into more depth on: The significance of the Hebronites? What kind of "valor" are we talking about?

👉 Amon his son, Josiah his son.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse! It’s a really interesting and symbolic passage from the Old Testament. Here's what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: This verse is about God’s plan for Israel and its future. It talks about a king named Amon and his son, Josiah. Here’s a breakdown of each part: “Amon his son” : This refers to the biblical figure of King Solomon. He was a wise and just ruler who built the Temple in Jerusalem. “Josiah his son” : This refers to Josiah, the next king of Judah after Solomon. What it’s saying is that God has chosen these two rulers – Solomon and Josiah – to lead Israel. It's like God is setting up a specific plan for the nation. The Significance: Divine Guidance: It suggests that God is guiding and overseeing events in Israel’s history, even with its ups and downs. Responsibility: It also implies that these two rulers are responsible for upholding God's laws and making righteous choices. In essence, the verse speaks of a divinely appointed leadership team to guide and rule Israel. --- Do you want me to explain any aspect of this verse in more detail? For example, would you like to know: More about King Solomon? The significance of Josiah’s reign?

👉 Amon [was] two and twenty years old when he began to reign, and reigned two years in Jerusalem.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Chronicles 33:21. It’s a really interesting part of the story of King David! Here's what it means in simple terms: Basically, David was young and powerful when he became king of Israel. Let’s unpack that a little further: “Amon [was] two and twenty years old…” – This tells us we’re talking about a very young man. He wasn't the oldest in the kingdom at the time, but definitely not a seasoned ruler. “…when he began to reign…” - He started his job as king. “and reigned two years in Jerusalem.” – This is the key part! He ruled for two whole years in the city of Jerusalem . So, it’s like saying he was a young and newly appointed king who took over and immediately began to govern. Why is this significant? This verse highlights David's early leadership and his quick rise to power. It shows that even though he wasn’t the most experienced ruler yet, he quickly established himself as king of Israel. Important Note: It’s a bit unusual for a young king to rule for two years in one place. It suggests he was focused on establishing his authority and perhaps dealing with some immediate issues within Jerusalem. --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse? Give you a little more context about the time period this verse comes from?

👉 Amon [was] twenty and two years old when he began to reign, and he reigned two years in Jerusalem. And his mothers name [was] Meshullemeth, the daughter of Haruz of Jotbah.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Kings 21:19. It tells us a lot about the beginning of King Amos’ reign in Jerusalem. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: Basically, this verse says: Amos was young: He was just twenty-two years old when he took over as king of Israel. He ruled for two years: He spent two full years in Jerusalem, being the king. His mother’s name is Meshullemeth: His mother's name is Meshullemeth. This suggests a family connection to the region of Jotbah, where his father lived. Let’s unpack it a bit further: The verse is part of a larger story about a period of chaos and instability in Israel after the death of King David. It sets up a situation where there was a king, but things were very difficult for the people. Important Note: This verse doesn't give us a lot of detail about Amos himself – it’s just a basic piece of history. It focuses on when he started his reign and how long he ruled. Does this tell us anything about him? While we don't know much about him, the fact that he was young and ruled for only two years suggests that things were still challenging during his time. --- Do you want me to: Explain a specific aspect of the verse in more detail? Connect this verse to a larger story or theme in the Bible?

👉 Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Ephesians 2:3. It's a pretty profound statement about humanity’s past and potential future. Here’s a breakdown in simpler terms: Overall Meaning: This verse speaks to a significant point about our fallen nature – that we were created with a predisposition towards anger and negativity, and that this tendency has been present throughout our lives. Let's unpack it piece by piece: "Ephesians 2:3" : This is the specific passage from the book of Ephesians. It’s a key part of understanding Paul’s message about salvation. “Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past…” – This means that before Jesus Christ, humanity was a collective group of people, and they were interacting with each other, experiencing desires – both physical (like hunger, thirst) and emotional (like jealousy, anger). Think of it as a shared experience of wanting things. “…in the lusts of our flesh…” - This is the core of the verse. "Flesh" refers to our physical body. "Lusts of our flesh" means that we were driven by primal desires – those instincts and impulses that govern how we feel in our bodies. It's about wanting things that aren’t healthy or aligned with God’s will. “…and of the mind…” - This refers to our thoughts, emotions, and judgments. We weren’t just reacting to physical urges; we were also letting those impulses influence how we think. “And were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.” – This is where it gets really powerful. "Children of wrath" means that we were born with a tendency towards anger and bitterness. We are designed to react negatively to things that upset us. We’re predisposed to feel angry, resentful, or judgmental – this is a fundamental part of our nature. “As others” suggests that this tendency wasn't unique to us; it was a common characteristic among all humans. So, what does this mean for us? Paul is saying that before Jesus Christ, we were born with a flawed state – a predisposition towards negativity and anger. This doesn’t mean we are inherently evil or incapable of good. Instead, it means we need to overcome this tendency through God's grace. The Key Takeaway: We are all born with a potential for anger and bitterness. But through faith in Jesus Christ, we can be transformed and reconciled with Him, allowing us to move towards a more peaceful and loving life. It’s important to note: This verse doesn't say we never experience negative emotions. It simply describes our natural state – a tendency that needs to be managed and redirected toward God. --- Do you want me to: Explain any of these concepts in more detail? Connect this verse to a specific theme (like forgiveness, redemption, or the need for grace)? Give an example of how we can work towards overcoming this tendency?

👉 Among the smooth [stones] of the stream [is] thy portion; they, they [are] thy lot: even to them hast thou poured a drink offering, thou hast offered a meat offering. Should I receive comfort in these?

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Isaiah 57:6. It’s a really interesting and slightly complex idea, so we'll go through it step-by-step. The Core Idea: This verse is about divine provision and acceptance. It suggests that God has a plan for things, and while we might not always want what He has in store for us, He still provides for us. It’s a bit metaphorical, but it speaks to a deeper relationship with God. Let's unpack the parts: “Among the smooth stones of the stream…” : This is a metaphor. Streams are flowing water, and “smooth stones” represent things that are easy to handle and don’t require much effort. It’s about something gentle and manageable. “…thy portion; they, they are thy lot:” This means "your share" or "your position." The "they" are the things God has designated for us. “even to them hast thou poured a drink offering…” : This is the crucial part! It’s like God is pouring out a special drink – perhaps something comforting, restorative, or even a blessing – specifically for those who are in His “lot.” It's a gesture of care and consideration. “Thou hast offered a meat offering:” This refers to sacrifices and offerings made to God as a sign of worship and devotion. It’s an acknowledgement of our relationship with the divine. “Should I receive comfort in these?” : This is the question at the end, highlighting the underlying feeling – is there something to be comforted by? So, what does it all mean? It's a message about: God’s Sovereignty: God has a plan for everything, even if we don't understand it completely. He doesn't just let things happen randomly. Divine Provision: God provides for us in ways that are often unseen and beyond our control. It’s not always about grand gifts; sometimes it’s about simple comfort and support. Acceptance & Gratitude: The verse is a reminder to be thankful for what God gives us, even when things aren't perfect or easy. It encourages an attitude of gratitude and recognizing that He has a purpose for our lives. In simpler terms: Imagine you’re walking through a stream. You don't get to pick where the water flows – it flows naturally. But God has designated certain spots for you, like a special place or a comfortable spot. He provides for you, even if it’s just a small drink offered, because He knows you need it. It’s a reminder that He is watching over us and providing for us. Do you want me to: Explain this verse in more detail? Discuss the significance of the "stream" metaphor? Connect it to other Bible verses about God's care for his people?

👉 Among the bushes they brayed; under the nettles they were gathered together.

Explanation: Okay, let's break down this Bible verse! It’s a really interesting and symbolic passage. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a scene where two groups of people – one of the bushes and another group – were working together in a way that highlights their strength and unity. Let's unpack it piece by piece: “Among the bushes they brayed…” - "Brayed" means to make a loud, sharp sound with your hooves (like a cow). This suggests a group of people were working together, perhaps in a busy or industrious way. It’s about doing something . “…under the nettles they were gathered together.” - “Nettles” are prickly plants. "Gathered together" means they were close and working as one unit. It implies a sense of camaraderie and collaboration. So, what's the big picture? The verse is painting a picture of strength in unity. It’s not just about physical strength, but about how people work together and cooperate to achieve something significant. The fact that they’re braying (making a loud sound) and gathering together suggests they were focused, determined, and supportive of each other. It’s a metaphor for: Teamwork: It emphasizes the importance of collaboration. Strength in community: It shows that a group can be powerful when it works together harmoniously. In short, this verse encourages us to value relationships and work as a team. --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Discuss the meaning of this verse in more detail?