Outrageously Funny Word Dictionary :: Acts 23:14

👉 And they came to the chief priests and elders, and said, We have bound ourselves under a great curse, that we will eat nothing until we have slain Paul.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this passage from Acts 23:14. It’s a really important and dramatic moment in the story of how Paul was dealt with. Here's what it means, explained simply: The Situation: Paul was accused: A crowd had gathered to accuse Paul of being a troublemaker – someone who wasn’t following God’s rules. They felt he was causing trouble and disrupting the community. They bound him under a curse: This is the core of the verse. The leaders, including the chief priests and elders of the city, essentially bound Paul to a period of fasting and restriction. It meant they were saying that he would have to abstain from food until he “slain” (killed) someone. What it Means – A Deeper Look: “Slay” is a tricky word: The Bible doesn't use the exact word "kill" here. It’s more figurative. It means to destroy , to be removed from a position of influence or responsibility, and to be excluded. Think of it as being exiled or removed from a crucial role. The purpose of the curse: The leaders weren't trying to punish Paul for what he did. They were attempting to control him. They feared his preaching and influence. It was a way to prevent him from spreading their beliefs or potentially causing problems. Why it’s significant: This event is considered a turning point in Paul’s life because it shows the power of the authorities to control and silence people. It highlights a conflict between faith and obedience, and the potential for those in power to use fear and restrictions as tools of oppression. In short, this verse describes a situation where Paul was unfairly accused and placed under a legal restriction – a temporary exile – because of his beliefs. --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Give you some context about the time period this story occurred in (around the 1st century)? Discuss the theological significance of this event?