Definition: Breach for breach, eye for eye, tooth for tooth: as he hath caused a blemish in a man, so shall it be done to him [again].

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this passage from Leviticus 24:20. It’s a really important and complex idea about justice and retribution. Here's an explanation in simple terms: The Core Idea: This verse is about retribution – punishment for wrongdoing. It’s saying that when someone does something truly terrible, the natural and just response is to make them suffer the same harm they inflicted. Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “Breach for breach, eye for eye, tooth for tooth…” : This compares a harmful act to a natural consequence like a bruise or a wound. It's drawing a parallel between violence and punishment. It highlights the idea that harming someone deserves harm in return. “…as he hath caused a blemish in a man, so shall it be done to him [again].” : This is the crucial part. The verse uses the analogy of a blemish . A blemish is something that makes someone look bad or flawed. The idea here is that any act of harm – big or small – causes a “blemish” in someone's character, their spirit, or their relationship with God. It’s like a mark that permanently stains someone’s soul. So, what does it mean practically? Leviticus 24:20 essentially says: "If you harm another person, then you must be harmed in return." It's a principle of justice and righteousness. It's a way of ensuring that wrongdoing doesn’t go unchecked. Important Context: This verse is part of the Old Testament laws concerning ritual purity and justice. It was intended to establish a system where offenders were held accountable for their actions, and the community would be protected from harm. In short, it's a reminder that violence has consequences, and we must respond to wrongdoing with righteous punishment. --- Disclaimer: I’m an AI assistant and this explanation is based on the interpretation of biblical texts. Different interpretations exist among theologians and scholars. This is just one perspective. Would you like me to: Explain another verse? Discuss the historical context of this passage?