Definition: Now the rest of the acts of Jehoahaz, and all that he did, and his might, [are] they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Kings 13:8. It’s a bit complex, but here's what it means in simple terms: What it says: “Now the rest of the acts of Jehoahaz, and all that he did, and his might, [are] they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?” Here’s a breakdown: “The rest of the acts…” : This refers to the entire story of Jehoahaz, a king who ruled harshly against the people of Judah. He was known for his cruelty and oppression. “…and all that he did, and his might…” : Basically, this means everything Jehoahaz did – every action he took as king – is being described. He wasn’t just doing bad things; he was actively causing harm. “Might” here refers to his power and authority. “[are] they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?” : This is the key part. The “book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel” is a record of the history, laws, and events of all the rulers of Israel. It’s like a historical document. So, what does this mean ? This verse essentially says that all of Jehoahaz's actions – his cruelty, his power, and everything he did – are being documented in the history of Israel. It’s saying that his reign was so terrible that it’s been completely lost to time. It suggests that Jehoahaz’s actions were so significant and damaging that they’ve been forgotten by the records of the kings who came after him. In a nutshell, it's an acknowledgment that Jehoahaz's reign was a dark period in Israel's history. Why is this important? This verse highlights the importance of remembering the past and learning from mistakes. It’s a reminder that even powerful rulers can cause immense harm, and that history needs to be kept accurate so we understand what happened before. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of the Bible verse? Give you a more detailed explanation of a specific aspect (like its historical context)?

Definition: And he said, I saw all Israel scattered upon the hills, as sheep that have not a shepherd: and the LORD said, These have no master: let them return every man to his house in peace.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Kings 22:17. It’s a really important and dramatic passage about God’s judgment. Here's what it means, explained simply: The Basic Idea: God is angry with Israel because they’ve become so scattered and lost their way. He’s telling them to go back home, back to their families and communities, and live in peace. Let’s look at the parts of the verse: “And he said…” : This tells us that God is speaking directly to someone – likely King David. “…I saw all Israel scattered upon the hills…” : This describes a terrible scene. It means that Israel has become so disorganized and lost their way, they’re wandering aimlessly across the land like sheep without a shepherd. Think of it as being completely lost and without direction. “As sheep that have not a shepherd:” This is a powerful metaphor. Sheep are vulnerable and need someone to protect them. The verse says they've become so disorganized, so independent, that they’re no longer safe or cared for. “…and the LORD said, These have no master: let them return every man to his house in peace.” : This is the crucial part. God tells Israel to go back home! He says that they (the Israelites) don't need a ruler or authority. He wants them to return to their families and communities so they can live peacefully. It’s a call for reconciliation and restoration. What does this mean practically? This verse is often interpreted as a warning about the dangers of independence and self-reliance. It emphasizes the importance of community, family, and trust in God's guidance. It suggests that if we stray too far from God’s plan and lose our connection to our families and communities, we become vulnerable – like sheep without a shepherd. In short: God is upset with Israel because they've lost their way and needs them to return home for peace and harmony. --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse? Discuss the context of this passage in more detail? Connect it to a specific event or story in biblical history?

Definition: [Be] of the same mind one toward another. Mind not high things, but condescend to men of low estate. Be not wise in your own conceits.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this passage from Romans 12:16. It’s a really important message about how we should treat others. Here's the explanation in simple terms: Basically, it means: Be United in Thought: Don’t be arrogant or think bigger than everyone else. Focus on being kind and understanding to people who are less fortunate or have different levels of knowledge and experience. Treat Others with Respect: Even if someone is struggling or doesn't know as much as you, treat them with respect and dignity. Don’t look down on them. Don’t Be Proudly Self-Important: Avoid boasting or thinking you’re better than everyone else. Pride can be a barrier to understanding and kindness. Let's unpack it a little bit: “Be] of the same mind…” This is saying we need to agree with each other – to see things from the same perspective. “…one toward another.” This emphasizes that we need to be considerate of everyone, not just those who are important to us. “…Mind not high things…": Don’t get carried away by lofty ideas or ambitions. Focus on the real needs and concerns of others. "...but condescend to men of low estate." This is the key part! It means to be humble, kind, and generous with people who are less privileged or have fewer opportunities than you. It’s about recognizing their worth as human beings. Why is this important? The Bible says that we are all created equal in God's eyes. Treating others with respect and humility is a way of honoring that creation. It shows love, compassion, and fairness. In short, Romans 12:16 is about being a good neighbor – treating everyone with kindness and recognizing their value. --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse from this passage? Discuss the meaning in a different way (e.g., relating it to our daily lives)?

Definition: I receive not honour from men.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down John 5:41 – “I receive not honor from men.” It's a really profound and important statement, and it has layers of meaning. Here’s a simple explanation: At its core, this verse is about Jesus’ focus and priorities. It means that Jesus wasn't interested in praise, recognition, or admiration from people like we typically think about when we talk about success or popularity. Let's unpack it bit by bit: “I receive…” : This is a key part. Jesus isn’t saying he deserves anything. He’s stating a fundamental truth about his own identity and purpose. “…not honor from men” : This is the core of the message. "Honor" means respect, admiration, praise, and recognition – things that humans often crave. This verse says Jesus doesn't want those things. What does this say about Jesus? His Purpose: It suggests Jesus’ primary purpose wasn’t to be admired or praised. His mission was to show love and compassion to humanity, and that involved being a servant of God. Humility: It speaks to his humility and his focus on serving others rather than seeking personal glory. God's Design: Some interpretations suggest this highlights that Jesus’ role is more about being the source of love and forgiveness than receiving accolades. Important Note: This doesn’t mean Jesus didn’t care about people! He cared deeply for humanity, but his focus was on deeper relationships – loving and helping others. In short, John 5:41 is a powerful statement about Jesus' priorities - he wasn't interested in human praise. --- Would you like me to: Explain another part of this verse? Discuss the context of this passage within the Bible? Connect it to a specific story or concept?

Definition: But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Corinthians 5:11. It’s a really important and stark warning about how we should treat each other. Here's the explanation in simpler terms: The Core Message: This verse is saying that we shouldn’t be friends with people who are engaging in these kinds of bad behaviors. It’s essentially saying that if someone is actively being a Christian, but also acting on these negative traits – like being a fornicator, covetous (wanting what others have), an idolater (worshiping things or people instead of God), a railer (constantly arguing and complaining), a drunkard, or an extortioner – then it’s not okay to be friends with them. Let's unpack each part: "But now I have written unto you..." : This isn’t just a random message; it’s a direct instruction from the Apostle Paul. He’s setting up a rule for the church community. "...not to keep company..." : This means avoid being around people who are actively doing these things. It's about avoiding their presence . "...if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator..." : This speaks directly to sexual relationships. It’s condemning actions that violate the principles of love, respect, and fellowship within the church. "...or covetous..." : This refers to greed or wanting what others have – being envious and desiring their possessions. "...or an idolater..." : This means worshipping false gods or idols – anything that isn’t directed at God. "...or a railer..." : This is about constantly complaining, arguing, and being critical. It's about negativity and difficulty in harmony. "...or a drunkard..." : This addresses behavior that is uncontrolled and potentially harmful to others – leading to recklessness or poor judgment. "...or an extortioner..." : This means taking advantage of people for personal gain without giving them anything in return – being dishonest and manipulative. The Key Takeaway: Paul is saying, "Don’t be friends with people who are actively harmful to the community's well-being." It emphasizes that true Christian love requires treating others with respect, kindness, and genuine fellowship. Why is this important? This verse is about maintaining a harmonious church – a community where everyone is striving for Godly behavior. It’s about prioritizing spiritual growth over unhealthy relationships. --- Disclaimer: I am an AI Chatbot and not a religious expert. This explanation is based on a common interpretation of the text within Christian theology. Do you have any specific questions about this verse that you'd like me to answer? For example, are you curious about: The historical context of the passage? How it relates to modern-day relationships?

Definition: So they shall wash their hands and their feet, that they die not: and it shall be a statute for ever to them, [even] to him and to his seed throughout their generations.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Exodus 30:21. It's a really important passage about how the Israelites were to be treated – and it has lasting significance for Jewish tradition. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: The Core Idea: This verse is about ritual cleanliness and a covenant with God. It’s saying that the Israelites were to be meticulously clean before entering into a special agreement with God. Let's unpack it piece by piece: “So they shall wash their hands and their feet…” – This describes a specific ritual cleansing process. It wasn’t just about getting clean; it was about a symbolic purification. “…that they die not:” – This is the crucial part. It means they were to be spared from death . The verse essentially says, “Because of this ritual, they would live and continue to exist.” “even [even] to him and to his seed throughout their generations.” – This is where it gets really powerful. It’s not just about the Israelites themselves; it's about all descendants of Abraham (who was the father of the Jewish people). It means that this rule of cleanliness and protection would continue forever, across all future generations. What does this mean practically? This verse is a foundation for many important traditions in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam – particularly regarding: The Sabbath: It's connected to the Jewish Sabbath, which emphasizes rest and holiness. Purity & Holiness: It reinforces the idea that God demands purity and respect. Blessing & Protection: It’s a promise of protection from harm and a blessing for future generations. In short, this verse is about establishing a sacred rule – a practice of cleanliness and preservation – that would ensure the continued existence and well-being of the Israelites and their descendants. --- Do you want me to: Explain any of these concepts in more detail? Give you an example of how this verse is used today?

Definition: Aijalon with her suburbs, Gathrimmon with her suburbs; four cities.

Explanation: Okay, let's break down this verse from Joshua 21:24. It’s a really significant and somewhat dramatic passage about the aftermath of a battle! Here's what it means in simple terms: The Core Idea: After the battle with the Amalekites, God decided to divide the land into four cities – Aijalon, Gathrimmon, and Shechem. Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “Joshua 21:24 Aijalon with her suburbs, Gathrimmon with her suburbs; four cities.” This is a very clear list. It's saying that after the battle, God decided to divide the land into four distinct areas – these are the names of the cities. “Aijalon with her suburbs, Gathrimmon with her suburbs”: This refers to two cities named Aijalon and Gathrimmon. These were important cities in the region, known for their settlements and perhaps even a significant connection to the Amalekites. “Four Cities.” This is the crucial part. The verse emphasizes that God specifically chose four cities – Aijalon, Gathrimmon, Shechem, and possibly others – as the result of this division. What does it mean in a broader sense? This verse is often interpreted as a symbolic representation of God’s judgment and restoration after a period of conflict. Here's what it can suggest: Justice and Restitution: It speaks to God’s right to restore what has been taken away or damaged. The division reflects a process of re-establishing order and justice in a disrupted land. God's Sovereignty: It shows that God is in control and doesn’t simply allow things to happen randomly. He chooses how to distribute his blessings and punish those who transgress. Important Context (Briefly): Joshua 21 is part of the story of the conquest of Canaan. The Amalekites were a powerful group, and the battle was a crucial step in establishing Israel's dominion over the land. This verse highlights God’s power to divide and control, and ultimately, to restore and establish His chosen people. In short, this verse tells us that God decided to divide the land into four cities after the battle with the Amalekites, signifying a period of judgment, restoration, and divine order. --- Would you like me to: Explain any part of it in more detail? Provide a deeper historical context?

Definition: And Attai begat Nathan, and Nathan begat Zabad,

Explanation: Okay, let's break down this verse from 1 Chronicles 2:36. It’s a really interesting and slightly mysterious little piece of history! Here's the explanation in simple terms: The Basic Idea: This verse describes the beginning of a story – a conversation between two people that sparked something significant. Let’s unpack it: Attai: This is a Hebrew word that means "a man" or "a person." Nathan: This was a very important figure in ancient Israelite history, known for his wisdom and being a prophet. Begat: This is a verb meaning “to begin,” “to start,” or “to initiate.” It’s like saying “started” or “began.” Zabad: This is a word that’s less clear – it's often translated as "a place" or "a spot." The Story: The verse tells us that Nathan, while speaking to Attai, began a conversation. And because of this conversation, Nathan started another conversation. What does this mean? It suggests that the beginning of a significant relationship, or even a problem, was sparked by a simple question and discussion. It implies that a challenge or a need led to further inquiry and ultimately, a new beginning. Why is it important? This verse is often seen as symbolic. It's not just about two people talking; it represents the beginning of something that had the potential for great change and growth. --- Important Note: This is an interpretation based on common understandings of the text. The exact meaning is still debated among scholars. Do you want to delve deeper into any particular aspect of this verse? For example, would you like to know: What kind of "challenge" or "problem" might have led to Nathan’s conversation? How does this relate to the larger story of the Old Testament?

Definition: That the hypocrite reign not, lest the people be ensnared.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Job 34:30. It's a really important and thought-provoking one! Here’s what it means in simpler terms: “That the hypocrite reign not…” – This is saying that someone who pretends to be righteous or good, but isn't actually true to their beliefs, shouldn’t hold power or influence. It’s about a leader who is misleading others. “…lest the people be ensnared.” – This is the core of the warning. “Ensnared” means trapped or led astray. If someone isn't genuine and honest, they can trick and mislead others, causing problems for everyone. In a nutshell, the verse warns against those who are pretending to be good but aren’t really true to their values. It suggests that hypocrisy can have serious consequences because it undermines trust and leads to harm. Why is this important? This verse is often interpreted as a warning about the dangers of pride and vanity – the tendency to believe we're better than we truly are. It encourages us to be honest with ourselves and others, and to strive for genuine goodness rather than just outward appearances. Does that make sense so far? Do you want me to explain it in more detail or perhaps connect it to a specific context (like the story of Job)? Just let me know!

Definition: Therefore, behold, I will bring evil upon the house of Jeroboam, and will cut off from Jeroboam him that pisseth against the wall, [and] him that is shut up and left in Israel, and will take away the remnant of the house of Jeroboam, as a man taketh away dung, till it be all gone.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this Bible verse together. It’s a pretty serious warning from God about a situation in ancient Israel. Here's what it means, explained simply: The Basic Idea: This verse is saying that God is going to punish Jeroboam, the second king of Israel, for disobeying him and causing problems. He’s essentially saying he’ll take away a portion of the people who are left in Israel because of his actions. Let's look at it piece by piece: “Therefore, behold…” : This is a way of introducing a warning or a significant event that’s about to happen. “…I will bring evil upon the house of Jeroboam…” : God intends to cause harm and trouble to Jeroboam's kingdom. "...and will cut off from Jeroboam him that pisseth against the wall…” : This is the key part. "Pisseth against the wall" means he’s breaking a rule or boundary. God is saying Jeroboam has been defiant and disobeyed him – perhaps he's trying to do something that God forbids. "...and [him] that is shut up and left in Israel, and will take away the remnant of the house of Jeroboam…” : God intends to isolate a portion of the people who are left with Jeroboam. He’s essentially saying he'll remove these people from the kingdom, leaving them vulnerable. “…as a man taketh away dung, till it be all gone.” : This is a powerful metaphor. It compares the situation to taking away dung (which is waste) – God is removing something valuable and necessary. The process continues until everything is gone. What's the message? This verse warns about disobedience and rebellion against God’s authority. It’s a reminder that God values order and obedience, and he will not tolerate those who stray from his path. It highlights that God can be very firm in punishing those who defy him. Important Context (briefly): In the Old Testament, this verse comes before the story of the division of Israel into two kingdoms – one ruled by Solomon, and the other under Jeroboam. It’s a warning about the potential for conflict and instability that could arise from disobedience. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of the verse? Talk about the historical context of this passage? Discuss what it might mean in terms of biblical themes (like obedience, justice, or divine judgment)?