Outrageously Funny Search Suggestion Engine :: Shall

👉 (modal, auxiliary verb, defective) Used before a verb to indicate the simple future tense in the first person singular or plural.

Alright class, settle down now, let’s take a look! You’ve come across “shall,” and the dictionary’s clue is quite clear – it's a modal auxiliary, holding futures near! Let’s break that down, nice and slow, so understanding starts to grow: Modal: Think of it as a helper word, a little nudge, you see. It adds a feeling, a subtle plea, to the verb that follows free. Auxiliary: This means “to help,” my dears, it supports the action, banishing fears! Defective: Now this is key, don’t you fret, “Shall” has limitations, a tricky net. It doesn't work with every verb around, just a select few can be found. Now, about that future tense, so bright and new – “Shall” helps us tell it, me and you! Specifically, when we are speaking, feeling bold, “I” or “We” shall stories unfold. Like saying: "I shall go," or “We shall see,” a promise made for you and me! But be careful now, there's one more thing to note, ‘Shall’ isn’t always the easiest route. It's used less often these days, it’s true, 'Will' is frequently seen anew. Does that make sense? Any questions bubbling up for you? Let's discuss!

👉 Shallum his son, Mibsam his son, Mishma his son.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Chronicles 4:25. It's a really interesting and somewhat mysterious passage that gets into the beginnings of God’s plan for Israel! Here’s what it means in simple terms: The Basic Idea: This verse tells us about two brothers, Shallum, Mibsam, and Mishma, who were born to a woman named Shallum. God decided to give them distinct roles and responsibilities within the kingdom of Israel. Let's unpack it layer by layer: “Shallum his son, Mibsam his son…” This establishes that they are the sons of a single mother – Shallum. “…Mibsam his son…” This means Mibsam was also a son of Shallum. “…and Mishma his son…” And this one too! The Significance - It’s about God’s Plan & Purpose: Now, here's where it gets really interesting and symbolic. The verse isn’t just about family; it’s a signpost of God’s plan for Israel. It suggests that God has already chosen these two brothers to play specific roles within the kingdom – essentially, to be part of His grand design. Possible Interpretations (These are debated among scholars): Leadership Roles: Some believe this verse points to the idea that God is preparing Israel for a future leader. The different names suggest they might have been given different strengths or skills needed in that leadership position. Different Paths: It could symbolize that each brother would follow a distinct path and contribute uniquely to the kingdom's success. God’s Favor & Blessing: Ultimately, it’s often interpreted as God’s blessing on these two brothers, recognizing their importance in His plan for Israel’s future. In short, this verse is a beautiful reminder that God has a purpose for each person and family within His kingdom, even from the very beginning. --- Do you want to explore any of these aspects further? For example, would you like me to: Explain a specific interpretation in more detail? Talk about the historical context of this verse? Discuss how this verse relates to other parts of Scripture?

👉 Shall I then take my bread, and my water, and my flesh that I have killed for my shearers, and give [it] unto men, whom I know not whence they [be]?

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Samuel 25:11. It’s a really interesting and somewhat complex passage about David and his relationship with Saul. Here's the explanation in simple terms: The Basic Situation: David was serving as governor of Israel. He had killed Saul, who was the King of Israel – essentially the most powerful leader at the time. David was tasked with distributing food and water to his people, but he wasn’t sure where these people came from. What He Said: He asked God, “Should I give this food and water to men I don't know, who are my people?” The Meaning – It’s About Trust and Divine Guidance: This verse isn't about David being greedy or selfish. It's a profound moment of faith and reliance on God. Here’s what it reveals: He was seeking guidance from God. David wasn’t just asking if he could do this; he was asking for God to tell him what to do . He wanted God’s perspective. He recognized that God is the ultimate authority. David understood that his role was to serve God and his people, and that God had a plan for everything. It highlights his trust in God's wisdom. The verse demonstrates a deep level of faith – he trusted that God would know what was best, even when he didn’t understand it all. Think of it like this: Imagine you’re lost in the wilderness and your compass is broken. You wouldn't just start wandering aimlessly; you'd probably ask for guidance from a local expert or a knowledgeable guide. David was doing something similar – seeking God's direction instead of relying solely on his own judgment. In short, this verse shows that David wasn’t trying to be a bad leader; he was humbly asking for God’s help and demonstrating a deep trust in His plan. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of the story related to this verse? Discuss the theological significance of this passage?

👉 Shallum the son of Jabesh began to reign in the nine and thirtieth year of Uzziah king of Judah; and he reigned a full month in Samaria.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse! It's a really interesting and somewhat mysterious passage from the Old Testament. Here’s what it means in simple terms: The Basic Story: This verse tells us about a very unusual period of time – a full month – that Shallum the son of Jabesh reigned in Samaria. Let’s unpack each part: “Shallum the son of Jabesh…” : This is a name, and it's important. It refers to a specific man named Shallum. “…began to reign…” : He started ruling. “…in the nine and thirtieth year of Uzziah king of Judah…” : This tells us who he was reigning under. Uzziah was a king of Judah, a region in Israel. This is a long time ago – the 9th and 30th years are significant because they're the longest periods of Uzziah’s reign. “…and he reigned a full month…” : This is the really strange part! He ruled for exactly one month . It's like a very long, unusual rule. “…in Samaria.” : He was ruling in the city of Samaria – a major center of power and wealth in Judah. So, what’s the big picture? This verse is about a king who unexpectedly took over power during a really long period of time, starting in the reign of Uzziah and lasting for just one month. It's a bit unusual and raises questions – why did he do this? Possible Interpretations (These are just theories, and different people have different ideas): Divine Providence: Some believe it’s a sign that God is involved in the affairs of nations and that He chose to intervene in a particular time. A Test or Challenge: It could be seen as a test for Uzziah's leadership or perhaps even a challenge to his authority. Unexpected Shift in Power: It suggests a significant shift in power dynamics, where someone unexpectedly rose to prominence. Important Note: This is a very old passage, and its meaning has been debated by scholars for centuries. It’s not always straightforward – it's full of symbolism! --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Discuss the context of this verse in more detail? Explore a specific interpretation of this passage?

👉 Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? shall there be evil in a city, and the LORD hath not done [it]?

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this biblical passage together. It's a really important one with a lot of layers! Here’s an explanation in simple terms: The Core Idea: This verse is about God’s judgment on a city and its people. It’s essentially saying that if a city becomes too wicked, then God will take action to stop it. Let's unpack it piece by piece: “Shall a trumpet be blown in the city…” – This refers to a signal or warning. Think of it like an emergency alert. It suggests that something bad is about to happen. “…and the people not be afraid?” – This is the crucial part. It’s asking if the people should be worried. It's suggesting there's a chance, however small, that things might get worse. “Shall there be evil in a city, and the LORD hath not done [it]?” – This is the direct question. The verse is essentially asking: “Will God allow this city to become completely corrupt and filled with wickedness, and will He still intervene to stop it?” What does this mean? This verse speaks to a time of significant crisis in the story of Israel. It’s talking about a period when the people were becoming increasingly ungodly – perhaps due to idolatry (worshiping idols instead of God), injustice, and general moral decay. God is warning that if these things continue, there's a risk that the city will become utterly terrible – filled with violence, hatred, and despair – and that God will intervene to prevent it. It’s a sense of impending doom and a call for God’s protection. Important Context: This verse appears in the Book of Amos, part of the Old Testament. It's often interpreted as a prophecy about the future destruction of Israel (and potentially the whole region) due to their sin. It’s a sobering reminder that even when things seem good, there’s always a potential for darkness and trouble. In short: God is warning that if a city continues on its path of wickedness, he will not stand idly by and let it continue. He's prepared to use his power to protect His people. --- Do you want me to: Explain this verse in more detail? Talk about the historical context surrounding this passage? Share some examples of how this principle applies today?

👉 Shall horses run upon the rock? will [one] plow [there] with oxen? for ye have turned judgment into gall, and the fruit of righteousness into hemlock:

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this biblical passage together. It’s a really powerful and thought-provoking verse from the book of Amos. Here's what it means in simpler terms: The Core Idea: This verse is warning about a dangerous path – one that leads to destruction and bitterness. It suggests we are on a road that’s twisting our judgment into something harmful. Let's unpack each part: “Shall horses run upon the rock?” : This refers to a situation where people are acting impulsively, recklessly, or without careful thought. Horses are associated with wildness and uncontrolled energy – think of a group of people acting foolishly. “will [one] plow [there] with oxen?” : This is about being careless and destructive. Oxen are strong and used for heavy work like plowing fields. It means someone is doing something that could cause harm or damage. “for ye have turned judgment into gall…” : This is the crucial part. "Judgment" refers to God’s righteous anger and punishment – the things that are right and just. But, “gall” is a bitter, poisonous substance. It suggests that our judgment (our anger, resentment, or harshness) has become something unpleasant and destructive. “and the fruit of righteousness into hemlock:” : This paints a very bleak picture. "Hemlock" is a poisonous plant. It symbolizes bitterness, despair, and ultimately, death. “Fruit of righteousness” means good, just, and moral actions – things that are beneficial to people and society. Turning it into this poison means our righteous actions have become destructive and harmful. Overall Meaning & Interpretation: Amos is essentially saying that if we let our anger, resentment, or harshness control us, we'll create a situation where our good intentions turn into something terrible – a cycle of destruction and suffering. It’s about the importance of controlling our emotions and acting with wisdom and compassion. In short: The verse warns against letting negativity and bitterness take over, and that these negative feelings can poison our actions and lead to harm. Does this make sense? Would you like me to explain any of these parts in more detail, or perhaps explore a specific aspect of the verse’s meaning? For example, we could discuss: The historical context of Amos's message. The significance of "judgment" as a metaphor for God’s justice.

👉 Shall not the land tremble for this, and every one mourn that dwelleth therein? and it shall rise up wholly as a flood; and it shall be cast out and drowned, as [by] the flood of Egypt.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Amos 8:8. It’s a really powerful and dramatic prediction about the future. Here's what it means in simpler terms: The Core Idea: This verse describes a catastrophic event – a massive flood – that will engulf a place, and cause widespread devastation and loss. Let’s unpack the parts: “Shall not the land tremble for this?” : This is asking if people should be worried about this impending disaster. It suggests a sense of unease and potential danger. “and every one mourn that dwelleth therein?” : This means that everyone – everyone – should feel sadness, grief, and regret about the situation. It’s not just a few individuals; it's a widespread feeling of sorrow. “it shall rise up wholly as a flood; and it shall be cast out and drowned, as [by] the flood of Egypt.” : This is the really striking part. It’s comparing this event to a massive flood – specifically, like the biblical Flood of Egypt (a devastating flood that wiped out much of humanity). What does this all mean? Judgment: The verse speaks of God's judgment on a specific place or people. It suggests that God is actively punishing something for its wickedness and sin. Destruction: The flood represents total destruction – the loss of everything, including lives, property, and even the physical landscape itself. Repentance: The phrase "as [by] the flood of Egypt" implies a call to repentance. It’s urging people to turn away from their wrongdoings and seek God's forgiveness. The flood is a symbol of overwhelming chaos and destruction caused by a lack of righteousness. In short, Amos 8:8 warns about a coming disaster that will be so great it will be devastating and cause widespread suffering. It’s a message of judgment and a plea for repentance. Important Note: The Bible often uses symbolic language to convey these messages. The "flood" is a metaphor for God's judgment and cleansing, and the people are meant to understand this as a warning about their own behavior. --- Do you want me to: Explain any of these concepts in more detail? Provide a brief historical context for this verse (how it fits into the larger story of the Old Testament)? Discuss what the verse might mean today in terms of our own lives and actions?

👉 Shall wood be taken thereof to do any work? or will [men] take a pin of it to hang any vessel thereon?

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Ezekiel 15:3. It's a really powerful and disturbing passage that speaks about destruction and judgment. Here’s a simplified explanation: The Basic Story: This verse describes a situation where God is sending a terrible storm to punish people for their wickedness. Specifically, it involves a large amount of wood being taken from a temple – a place of sacredness – and then used for anything else. Let’s unpack the meaning piece by piece: “Shall wood be taken thereof…” This means that wood was being taken from a specific place – likely a temple or building – in a way that was causing harm or distress. “…to do any work?” This is the crucial part. It’s asking if people are using this wood for any purpose at all – even just to hang things on. “Or will [men] take a pin of it to hang any vessel thereon?” This is where it gets really unsettling. It suggests that people are literally taking small pieces of the wood and using them to attach things to vessels (like boats, barrels, or even other objects). “Onethrow” means "hang" or "place on." What’s the Message? This verse paints a picture of severe consequences for those who are deeply corrupted by sin. It's a warning about: The power of God: God is actively involved and using this destruction to punish people who have strayed from his path. The potential for harm: Taking wood, especially from sacred places, can be incredibly destructive – it’s causing pain and disruption. Moral responsibility: It highlights the importance of living a righteous life and avoiding sin because it has consequences. In short, the verse warns against seeking to use God's creations for anything other than their intended purpose and suggests that those who are consumed by evil will face serious judgment. Important Note: This is a very dramatic passage from the Bible. It’s not meant to be taken lightly. It’s a reminder of the seriousness of sin and the importance of seeking forgiveness and turning back to God. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of this verse? Provide context about Ezekiel's time or the situation he was describing?

👉 Shall I cause [it] to return into his sheath? I will judge thee in the place where thou wast created, in the land of thy nativity.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Ezekiel 21:30. It’s a pretty serious and impactful statement about consequences for wrongdoing. Here's a simple explanation: The Basic Idea: This verse essentially says that God is going to hold someone accountable for their actions – and the resulting damage they cause. It’s like saying, “You did this, and now you’ll face the results of your choices.” Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “Shall I cause [it] to return into his sheath?” This is a metaphorical way of saying “I will judge you.” The "it" is ambiguous, but it likely refers to a person or group. Think of it like a garment being returned into a pouch – it’s being brought back for punishment. “I will judge thee in the place where thou wast created…” This means God will hold someone responsible for their origins – their birthplace. It's saying that the consequences are directly linked to where they began. “…in the land of thy nativity.” This is the crucial part. “ nativity” means "place of birth" or "origin." So, it’s saying God will judge you because of where you were born . It suggests a deep connection between your beginnings and your fate. Putting it all together: God is going to punish someone for their actions – especially if those actions originated in a place they were created. It's a powerful message about responsibility, consequence, and the idea that our choices have repercussions, even before we’ve fully lived our lives. Important Note: This verse often gets interpreted as a warning against evil and encourages repentance. It emphasizes that God sees everything and will ultimately hold people accountable for their deeds, regardless of how long ago they happened or where they were born. Do you want me to explain any of this in more detail? For example, would you like: A deeper look at the meaning of " nativity"? How this verse relates to other biblical themes (like sin and punishment)?

👉 Shallum, Amariah, [and] Joseph.

Explanation: Okay, let's break down this verse from Ezra 10:42: “Shallum, Amariah, and Joseph.” Essentially, this verse tells us about three important figures who were involved in a significant event during the time of King Darius. Here’s a simplified explanation: The Situation: A Problem with the Temple: The Jewish people had been practicing idolatry – worshipping false gods – for a long time. This was causing problems with the Jewish community and the temple, which was the central place of worship. Darius's Intervention: King Darius, who was a powerful Persian ruler, saw this as a threat to his kingdom and its stability. He decided to intervene. The Verse’s Meaning: This verse describes three individuals – Shallum, Amariah, and Joseph – who were brought before him and were ordered to be removed from their positions of power and responsibility within the Jewish community. It wasn't a judgment for them; they were simply asked to leave. The Context - It’s about Leadership: This is a crucial part of understanding the story in Ezra 10. The verse highlights that the leadership of the Jewish people was being challenged and potentially undermined by those who refused to follow God's laws. It shows that the situation wasn't just about religious practice, but also about political power and responsibility. In short: This verse describes a group of three influential figures – Shallum, Amariah, and Joseph – who were removed from their positions because they weren’t fulfilling their duties as leaders according to God’s will. Important Note: The exact details of the situation are somewhat vague in the biblical text, but this provides a basic understanding of its significance within the context of the time. --- Do you want me to: Explain any specific part of this verse in more detail? Give you a quick summary of what Ezra 10 is about?