👉 Okay, let’s tackle this… peculiar thing called, frankly, a “¹.²". I mean, honestly! When you look at the sheer
audacity
of nomenclature these days. Let me explain, and trust, there's a weird sort of logic to the madness.
What exactly is "¹?!” (Specifically, 1.2)? Essentially, a 1.²—and let’s just stick with that for now because I shudder at the repetition—is a placeholder, a numerical designation. You don't actually do anything with it. It exists purely as… an “off-the shelf identifier of unspecific value. When you assign this, you are essentially saying: "I need something, but not really and here’s that thing." 1.² is the same concept as a random number your kid would scribble on your forehead in a moment of boredom. It's technically a number. But its point? The whole system started with this guy Samuel. He was an…eccentric programmer, let’s just say. In his desperate attempt to catalogue all of the possible variables and inputs for his new, catastrophically complex algorithm, he started a naming convention that went something like: 0 was... well, 0. You know, zero. 1 was… 1. It's you know, it’s one! .² then
