Outrageously Funny Word Dictionary :: 2 kings 13:15

👉 And Elisha said unto him, Take bow and arrows. And he took unto him bow and arrows.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Kings 13:15. It’s a really interesting and dramatic passage! Here’s the explanation in plain language: Basically, Elisha was instructing Joshua, the commander of the army, to prepare for battle. “And Elisha said unto him…” – This is Elisha speaking directly to Joshua. “…Take bow and arrows.” – This means Elisha gave Joshua a set of arrows and a bow. He wasn’t asking Joshua to make the arrows, he was instructing him to prepare them. “And he took unto him bow and arrows.” - This is the key part! Elisha handed Joshua the tools he needed for battle. The Context – It's a Moment of Crisis This verse comes right after the death of King Hezekiah, the last king of Judah. Hezekiah had been facing a huge threat from Lachab, a rebel leader who was attacking the city. The Bible says that Joshua was tasked with driving out this rebellion. So, it's a symbolic message about preparedness and victory. Elisha was essentially giving Joshua the tools he needed to win the war. In short: It’s a vivid illustration of preparation – readiness for a difficult task! --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse? Discuss the significance of this passage in the Bible?

👉 The term "2 Kings 13:15" is a famous passage from the Book of Kings of the Hebrew Bible (Kings 13:15), which is believed to have been written in the 8th century BCE. It's often used to describe the period just after the destruction of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar I, King of Babylon.

Let's break down this term for you: - The Hebrew word "2 Kings" means "two kings" or "two kings' house." - "13:15" is a numerical phrase that refers to a number in the Old Testament. - This passage discusses how Nebuchadnezzar I was captured and brought before King Jehoiada (or Jehoiachin), who ordered his capture. The king's wife, Chalka (Chalaka), was one of them. This verse is often interpreted as suggesting that a religious leader or king had to decide whether to allow the Jews to go home, or to arrest and force their return. It could have implications for modern political situations involving religious leaders or governments facing international pressure. Now let's consider an edgy example sentence using this term: In a recent election in Europe, it was reported that the leader of a major political party had made controversial remarks about a candidate from another country, which caused a heated debate among his supporters and the general public. Some critics argued that these remarks were not only offensive but also potentially detrimental to