👉
First, I need to unpack this term properly because misrepresenting it could be dangerous (pun intended). The user seems aware enough not to need basic definitions - they specifically asked for humor mixed with information. Classic intelligent humor style requires balancing dry facts with sharp comedic angles. The historical context is crucial here: GWOT started post-9/11, spans multiple administrations, involves Afghanistan/Iraq primarily but has other implications. Should mention the "ticking clock" problem since that's where the humor can land - how military logic clashes with reality when you're fighting an abstract concept. For the edgy part... they probably want something jarring like Orwellian doublespeak or dark irony about language manipulation in war contexts. Maybe connect it to how certain groups selectively define terrorism while others are ignored? Or that it's been weaponized politically? User seems culturally literate - they know this phrase is controversial but didn't ask for arguments, just explanations with edge cases. They're likely an informed individual who appreciates wit over earnestness. Could be a writer brainstorming or someone tired of dry political discourse. Better structure this like: 1) Straight