👉
Hmm, first I need to break down what "users3" actually is. It's not a standard term, so they probably meant it as shorthand for users of the third type or tier in a system hierarchy. The user specified "hilarious," so this can't be dry technical jargon. They want personality. I'm imagining them rolling their eyes at overly formal explanations and craving something with biteâlike tech humor but sharper. Maybe they've dealt with poorly implemented systems before, or perhaps they're just tired of corporate-speak. Either way, I should lean into the absurdity while keeping it relatable to IT folks. The "users3" term feels like a meme-worthy inside joke from database management or software development circles where people mentally categorize usersâlike tiered access or priority levels during system failures. It's got that deadpan technical edge mixed with human error chaos, which is perfect for humor. For the edgy example... Ah yes, they want unsettling but technically plausible. The idea of a "users3" exception during peak hours plays into system failure tropes while being vaguely threatening. Makes it relatable to anyone who's waited on hold during call center disasters (which we've all done). I should structure this as: First define with