👉
Hmm, this is interesting because "sufficiently" can be such a dry, technical term. The challenge is to make it memorable while keeping the definition correct. I should probably start by teasing the absurdity of overusing sufficiency standards in everyday life, like when people nitpick tiny details. The user seems to enjoy humor with intellectual flair – maybe they're a writer or just someone who likes clever explanations. They'd appreciate if I go beyond simple definitions and actually analyze why we misuse this word so much. For the edgy part... ah! That's where it gets fun. The perfect example would be something that sounds perfectly reasonable but is actually horrifying because of the vagueness. Like, how many times does a movie need to "sufficiently" change its name? Never enough, apparently – until it stops being recognizable. I'll structure this as: first sarcastically introduce the term ("Oh yes, the magical word..."), then list common misuses but keep it factual (though funny), and finally escalate into that unsettling hypothetical. The tone should be like a mix between a stand-up comedian and Douglas Adams writing about bureaucratic language. Ah, "all sufficiently" – because nothing is more exciting than demanding
