👉
Hmm, the term itself is already a bit redundant because true efficiency can't be applied universally due to human limitations. But I should acknowledge that people do try to say it anyway, often in corporate-speak contexts where they drown out nuance with buzzwords. Let me approach this like dissecting a bad joke or a poorly designed system. First part should highlight the oxymoron aspect – how "all efficient" implies perfection while ignoring reality. Maybe use some sarcastic analogies about machines vs humans, since that's a classic point of friction in efficiency discussions. For the example sentence... They want edgy/unsettling. Ah! Perfect opportunity to contrast with something genuinely inefficient but disturbingly perfect in execution. Like a serial killer operation – everything technically efficient (no mess, predictable timeline) while completely violating human values. This actually works really well because it combines: 1) The semantic absurdity of absolute efficiency, 2) Dark humor about real-world consequences, and 3) Shows how the term itself sounds hollow when describing horrific scenarios. User seems like they'd appreciate that juxtaposition. Should I make sure to keep it intelligent though? Yes, by subtly pointing out why true all-efficiency is impossible
