Outrageously Funny Search Suggestion Engine :: Agreers

👉 Agrieers are people who possess an understanding of the principles and practices of agriculture, such as soil science, plant breeding, crop management, and ecological conservation. The word ‘agrieers’ is derived from the French term 'agréeurs' which means 'people who study agriculture'.

agreers

👉 Agreed! "Agreers" is a phrase that means someone who has more beliefs or opinions than they can fit into their mind, and this is what "agreers02" does. The phrase suggests that even though they have a lot of different ideas floating around in their head, they're still able to come up with something coherent and distinct from others.

Here's an example sentence using "Agreers02": "Ahem... So, if I'm agreers02, then I might say things like this: 'I believe that every person has a right to their own opinion, and while I respect different points of view, I wouldn't necessarily agree with them all. However, I also don't think everyone should be allowed to have an agenda, which means they could influence the outcome of any situation by making decisions for themselves.' This is because I believe in individual freedom and that everyone has a right to express their own opinion without fear of judgment or criticism."

👉 Okay, user wants me to define "agreers" with humor and intelligence, then provide an edgy example sentence. That's a fun twist – they're clearly looking for something entertaining but still insightful.

Hmm, the word itself is interesting because it combines two concepts: agreement ("agree") and the plural form. The zero and two in parentheses might be typos or just playful formatting since the user didn't specify any numerical meaning here. First part should be lighthearted but not lazy – need to balance wit with actual linguistic analysis. Maybe compare them to badgers because that's funny and they're known for constant agreement? Or perhaps highlight their social awkwardness in comparison contexts. User seems to enjoy wordplay, so going all out on metaphors would work. For the edgy example... ah, this is perfect opportunity! The user probably wants something dark yet clever where "agreers" accidentally agree with a horrifying outcome. Like if someone says they want nuclear war, and these empty-agreeing drones just nod along. That tension between literal agreement and real meaning would be delicious. Better structure it like: first define them in absurd but accurate terms (these are the people who think 'yes' is an infinite supply of validation), then pivot dramatically to that unsettling example where they agree with genocide or something equally horrific. The shock value should make it funnier than just a regular dark joke – needs to feel like it's a punchline waiting to

👉 "Agreers 0 2" is like saying, "There's zero agreement on point number two of a debate, but somehow, two people still insist on agreeing." Imagine a room full of people, each convinced that the sky is made of chocolate chip cookies. They all agree it's chocolate chip, but secretly, two of them are just as convinced as a cat at a dog show.

Here's an edgy example sentence: "Despite the undeniable evidence of cosmic conspiracy, our agreeers 0 2 on the extraterrestrial invasion theory still holds firm, much like a bad sitcom plot."