A curated collection of wild, outrageous, and hilarious profanity definitions and pronunciations for your churning, educational learning, and entertainment.

Definition: And the anger of the LORD was kindled against Uzza, and he smote him, because he put his hand to the ark: and there he died before God.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this passage from 1 Chronicles 13:10. It's a really important and somewhat dramatic verse in the Bible, and it speaks about a serious consequence of a mistake. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Story: Uzza was in a big ark: Uzza was a young man who was inside a large wooden boat – an ark – that was used to carry God's people. He put his hand to the ark: Uzza, perhaps because he was feeling proud or foolish, reached out and touched the ark’s lid. The LORD (God) was angry: This is the key part. God felt deeply upset with Uzza's action. It wasn’t a simple disagreement; it was a sign of a very serious transgression against God's will. What happened next: He smote him: God, in his anger, dealt a terrible punishment on Uzza. He killed him. He died before God: The most important part is that Uzza died before God. This means he was punished by God directly – it wasn't just a consequence of the situation; it was a direct act of divine judgment. What does this mean in a broader sense? This verse is often interpreted as a reminder of: God’s Sovereignty: It emphasizes that God is in control and doesn’t tolerate wrongdoing. He doesn't just passively let things happen; he actively judges them. The Importance of Obedience: It’s a warning to be careful about what we do, especially when it involves trust or respect for God. Divine Justice: It highlights that God will ultimately bring justice and punishment for those who disobey him. Important Note: This verse is often used in the context of Israel's rebellion against God. It’s a stark example of how even seemingly small actions can have significant consequences when done with disrespect or pride. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of this verse? Discuss what it might mean in a specific historical context (like the story of Israel's rebellion)? Give you a different, simpler analogy to understand the idea?

Definition: And the Spirit of God came upon Saul when he heard those tidings, and his anger was kindled greatly.

Explanation: Okay, let's break down this verse from 1 Samuel 11:6. It’s a really important and somewhat unsettling passage in the Bible that speaks about how quickly anger can be ignited. Here's what it means in simpler terms: Basically, it says that God sent a feeling of intense anger towards Saul – a man who was already troubled by his own flaws and insecurities. Let’s unpack that a little further: “The Spirit of God came upon Saul…” : This is a dramatic phrase. It means God felt something within Saul, like a powerful surge of emotion. “…when he heard those tidings…” : Saul was already struggling with his own problems – maybe he was feeling insecure, guilty about something, or just generally unhappy. The “tidings” refer to the news that David, a very important and powerful man, had been chosen to be King of Israel. “…his anger was kindled greatly.” : This is the key part! It means Saul's anger quickly flared up – it wasn’t just a small spark; it became a really intense and overwhelming feeling. It was like a fire starting in a dry field. So, what happened next? The Bible says that Saul became incredibly angry at David. He felt betrayed and humiliated, and this anger led him to do some truly terrible things – he hunted David’s men and tried to kill him. Why is this important? This story shows us that any feeling of anger can be dangerous if it's not controlled. It highlights the importance of: Self-awareness: Being aware of our own emotions and where they come from. Control: Trying to manage our anger rather than letting it overwhelm us. In short, this verse warns us that anger is a powerful force that can lead to bad decisions. Do you want me to explain any part of this in more detail or perhaps discuss the context of the story?

Definition: And Eliab his eldest brother heard when he spake unto the men; and Eliab’s anger was kindled against David, and he said, Why camest thou down hither? and with whom hast thou left those few sheep in the wilderness? I know thy pride, and the naughtiness of thine heart; for thou art come down that thou mightest see the battle.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Samuel 17:28. It's a really powerful and dramatic moment in the story of David and Goliath. Here’s what it means, explained simply: The Core Situation: Goliath is Coming: God has chosen Goliath to challenge King Saul. Goliath is a giant warrior, much stronger than any human. David is Present: David is there, facing Goliath in a battle. This is a huge moment – the ultimate test of faith and courage. What the Verse Says - A Bit More Detailed: “And Eliab his eldest brother heard when he spake unto the men; and Eliab’s anger was kindled against David, and he said, Why camest thou down hither? and with whom hast thou left those few sheep in the wilderness? I know thy pride, and the naughtiness of thine heart; for thou art come down that thou mightest see the battle.” Let’s unpack each part: “And Eliab his eldest brother heard when he spake unto the men…” - This means David's brother, Eliab, was listening to what happened. “Eliab’s anger was kindled against David…” - This is crucial . Eliab’s anger started because he felt David was challenging him and disrespecting his authority. He felt like David was trying to usurp his position. “…and he said, Why camest thou down hither?…?” – Eliab was asking, “Why are you here? What are you doing here?” He's questioning David’s presence and purpose. “and with whom hast thou left those few sheep in the wilderness?” - This is a very pointed question. Eliab is saying, "You're leaving me , my brother, alone with those few sheep in the wilderness!" He feels like he's being sidelined. "I know thy pride, and the naughtiness of thine heart; for thou art come down that thou mightest see the battle." - This is the most important part. Eliab says, "I know your pride (meaning his arrogance or self-importance) and you’re coming to see the battle.” He believes David is trying to provoke a fight, and he's warning that this will be a significant confrontation. The Meaning Behind It: This verse highlights a tension between David and Eliab. Eliab feels slighted and threatened by David's presence. His anger isn’t just about seeing the battle; it's about feeling like he’s being ignored or diminished in the face of this powerful challenge. It's a Moment of Transition: The verse sets up a dramatic shift. It’s not just about David and Goliath; it’s about the beginning of a conflict where Eliab's anger might be a key factor in how the battle will unfold. It suggests that this isn’t just about strength, but also about the relationship between David and his brother. --- In short: This verse shows a moment of tension and potential conflict between two brothers, rooted in Eliab’s resentment and a sense of being undervalued. It foreshadows a significant challenge ahead. Do you want me to: Explain any of these points further? Connect this passage to other Bible stories?

Definition: Then Saul’s anger was kindled against Jonathan, and he said unto him, Thou son of the perverse rebellious [woman], do not I know that thou hast chosen the son of Jesse to thine own confusion, and unto the confusion of thy mother’s nakedness?

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Samuel 20:30. It's a really intense and dramatic passage in the Bible, and it’s packed with meaning. Here’s a simplified explanation: The Basic Situation: Saul is King: We’re talking about King Saul, one of the most powerful and troubled kings in the Old Testament. He’s struggling with a huge problem – he's deeply unhappy with his son, Jonathan. Jonathan is Targeted: Saul focuses all his anger on Jonathan because he feels like Jonathan has made a mistake – or perhaps even betrayed him. He sees Jonathan as being confused and potentially acting in ways that are not right for him. The “Perverse Rebel” Label: The word "perverse" means going against God’s will or principles. Saul uses this label to describe Jonathan, implying he's defying his father’s instructions and perhaps even God himself. What He Says (and the Meaning Behind It): Saul says this with a harsh and angry tone: “You son of the perverse rebellious [woman], do not I know that you have chosen the son of Jesse to your own confusion, and unto the confusion of thy mother’s nakedness?” Let's unpack that: “Perverse Rebel”: This is key. Saul believes Jonathan has gone astray – he's made a choice that doesn’t align with what God wants for him. He sees this as a rebellious act against his father's guidance. "Your Mother’s Nakedness": This is the most unsettling part. It’s metaphorical, but it suggests that Jonathan is being manipulated or influenced in a way that’s causing him distress and perhaps even shame. Saul is saying he sees Jonathan as being led astray by someone else – possibly a woman or other figure who is causing him trouble. Overall Interpretation: This verse paints a picture of intense anger and frustration from Saul. It highlights the deep pain and conflict within him, fueled by his perception that Jonathan has made a critical mistake. It’s a moment where Saul's emotions are so overwhelming that he lashes out at his son. Important Note: The word "perverse" is debated among scholars. Some believe it refers to a specific type of male behavior, while others interpret it as a broader metaphor for a rebellious spirit or a lack of divine guidance. --- Do you want me to: Explain this verse in more detail? Connect it to other stories in the Bible? Discuss its significance within Saul's character and his relationship with Jonathan?

Definition: Then Amaziah separated them, [to wit], the army that was come to him out of Ephraim, to go home again: wherefore their anger was greatly kindled against Judah, and they returned home in great anger.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Chronicles 25:10. It's a really important passage about judgment and consequences. Here’s the explanation in simple terms: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a very serious situation where a powerful king named Amaziah was making a decision to punish Judah, a region of Israel. He separated a large army from Ephraim – a group of people – and then returned them home, but this time with a huge amount of anger simmering within them. Let's unpack it layer by layer: “Then Amaziah separated them…” - This means Amaziah took a specific group of soldiers and people away from the rest of his kingdom. “…to go home again…” - He was essentially sending these people back to their homeland, Ephraim. He wanted to bring them back somewhere . “Wherefore their anger was greatly kindled against Judah…” – This is the key part. "Anger" means a strong feeling of resentment and displeasure. Amaziah saw that Judah (the region of Israel) was causing problems, and this angered him deeply. He felt betrayed or wronged by them. “…and they returned home in great anger.” - They returned to their homeland, but this time with a very powerful and unpleasant attitude – an angry one. What does it mean? This verse is telling us that Amaziah was upset about something happening in Judah. It wasn't just a small disagreement; he felt like they were causing trouble for him and his kingdom. The anger of the people in Judah caused him to act severely – to send them back home. In short, it’s a story of a king's judgment based on the actions of his people. Important Context: This verse comes before another important passage about the destruction of Jerusalem. It suggests that the problem wasn’t just a minor disagreement; it was a bigger issue with roots in Judah’s behavior. It’s a reminder that sometimes, anger and resentment can lead to terrible consequences. --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse from 2 Chronicles? Discuss the historical context of this passage? Give you some possible interpretations of what it might mean today?

Definition: Wherefore the anger of the LORD was kindled against Amaziah, and he sent unto him a prophet, which said unto him, Why hast thou sought after the gods of the people, which could not deliver their own people out of thine hand?

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Chronicles 25:15. It's a really important and dramatic moment in the story of King David and his friend Amaziah. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Situation: Amaziah is a powerful king: He’s a wealthy, influential ruler in Israel. David is a young man sent to seek him out: David, a shepherd boy, was entrusted with a mission by Samuel – to talk to Amaziah about something important. Amaziah is being difficult: He's refusing to let his people go free from a terrible plague that’s devastating their land. They’re suffering because he’s not listening to the prayers of his people. The Verse Explained: “Wherefore the anger of the LORD was kindled against Amaziah, and he sent unto him a prophet, which said unto him, Why hast thou sought after the gods of the people, which could not deliver their own people out of thine hand?” Let’s unpack that: "Wherefore the anger of the LORD was kindled..." - This means that God really felt angry with Amaziah. It wasn't just a slight annoyance; it was a deep, righteous indignation. "...against Amaziah..." – David was sent to confront this particular king. "...and he sent unto him a prophet..." - David had someone specifically tasked with speaking to Amaziah. "...which said unto him..." – This is the key part. The prophet told Amaziah something very harsh and accusing. "Why hast thou sought after the gods of the people, which could not deliver their own people out of thine hand?" - This is the core of the accusation. The prophet was saying: “You’re seeking help from the gods of the people! You're trying to solve a problem that you created – you’ve been failing to protect your people.” What it means overall: Amaziah was being disrespectful and refusing to listen to God's plan for his people. David, through this prophet, is essentially calling out Amaziah for his selfishness and inaction. God is outraged because he’s being ignored! Why was this a big deal? This verse is significant because it shows: Divine Justice: God isn't just annoyed; He’s actively punishing those who disrespect His will. David’s Role: David, though young, is taking on a powerful and important role – confronting the wicked and speaking up for what is right. In short, it’s a story about God’s anger, a king's stubbornness, and a prophet challenging a king to change his ways. --- Would you like me to: Explain any of these parts in more detail? Provide some context on the time period this verse came from? Discuss what this verse might symbolize (like the struggle between good and evil)?

Definition: And the anger of the LORD was kindled against Israel, and he delivered them into the hand of Hazael king of Syria, and into the hand of Benhadad the son of Hazael, all [their] days.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Kings 13:3. It's a really important passage that describes a significant shift in history. Here's what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Story: Israel was in trouble: The verse starts with a very bad situation for Israel – they were facing a lot of problems and being controlled by other nations. The LORD’s anger flared up: God, the powerful God mentioned in the Bible, became really angry at Israel. It wasn't just a simple disagreement; it was a deep, intense feeling of displeasure. He delivered them into the hands of others: God decided to punish Israel and send them to other kingdoms – specifically, Hazael from Syria and Benhadad from Syria. These kings were seen as enemies of God and were given control over Israel. What does it mean in simpler terms? It’s essentially a story about divine judgment and a shift in power. God is actively choosing to punish Israel because they disobeyed him and became reliant on other nations for their well-being. It's a powerful statement of God's sovereignty – He’s in charge, and He’s using His anger to bring consequences. Key Takeaway: 2 Kings 13:3 describes a period where Israel was trapped and controlled by foreign powers, highlighting God’s displeasure with their disobedience. --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse? Discuss the context of this passage (like when it happened)? Talk about the reasons behind God's anger?

Definition: Go ye, inquire of the LORD for me, and for the people, and for all Judah, concerning the words of this book that is found: for great [is] the wrath of the LORD that is kindled against us, because our fathers have not hearkened unto the words of this book, to do according unto all that which is written concerning us.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Kings 22:13. It's a really important and dramatic passage about God’s anger and the consequences of ignoring his word. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Situation: God is angry: The verse starts with God expressing intense displeasure – “great wrath” – at the Israelites (and Judah, which includes them). It's a very serious feeling of punishment coming from him. He’s asking for help: God isn’t just complaining; he’s asking for someone to investigate and understand what’s happening. He wants to know why he’s so angry. The Problem is Ignoring Him: The core issue is that the Israelites – and particularly their leaders – haven't been listening to God’s instructions and guidance. They’ve been ignoring what he tells them to do. Let's unpack it further: “Go ye, inquire of the LORD…” : This is a command from God. He wants someone to actively seek out His wisdom and understanding. “…for me, and for the people, and for all Judah…” : This focuses on a specific group – the Israelites – and emphasizes that this isn't just a problem affecting them individually; it’s a widespread issue that impacts everything they do. “Judah” refers to the kingdom of Israel. “…concerning the words of this book that is found…” : This is key! The verse speaks about a specific book – the Book of Judges. This book contained important laws, warnings, and instructions for the Israelites. What's the big takeaway? God’s anger isn’t just because they messed up now . It’s because they’ve been consistently ignoring his guidance for a long time. This is a pattern of disobedience that’s leading to serious consequences. It’s like a chain reaction – ignoring one thing leads to another, and so on. In short: God is deeply disappointed with the Israelites' lack of obedience and is unleashing his wrath because they haven’t followed His instructions. Important Note: This passage is often interpreted as a warning about the dangers of disobedience and the importance of listening to God's word. It highlights the need for faithfulness and obedience to divine guidance. --- Do you want me to explain any part of this verse in more detail, or perhaps explore its connection to other biblical stories? For example, would you like a deeper look at: The Book of Judges? The concept of God’s judgment?

Definition: Because they have forsaken me, and have burned incense unto other gods, that they might provoke me to anger with all the works of their hands; therefore my wrath shall be kindled against this place, and shall not be quenched.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this Bible verse together. It’s a pretty serious one and speaks about God’s feelings towards those who are rejecting him. Here's a simplified explanation: The Basic Idea: This verse describes God’s intense anger and punishment when people don’t worship him and actively try to provoke him with their wickedness. It’s like saying, “I’m really disappointed and angry because you’re not listening to me.” Let's unpack it piece by piece: “Because they have forsaken me…” – This means they stopped worshipping God. They didn’t acknowledge him as the source of their being or their purpose in life. It’s like turning away from a loving parent. “…and have burned incense unto other gods…” – This is the major part. They were making offerings (incense) to other gods, trying to get God's attention and make him angry. Think of it as trying to bribe or manipulate him with something else. “that they might provoke me to anger with all the works of their hands…” – This is a bit more figurative. "Works of their hands" means everything they do – their building, their art, their rituals, their lives. They were trying to distract God and make him angry by doing things that weren’t about worshiping Him. “Therefore my wrath shall be kindled against this place…” – This is a strong statement: God's anger is going to start . “Wrath” means intense fury and judgment. “…and shall not be quenched.” - This is the crucial part. It’s like saying that God’s anger won’t stop, it will continue until things are righted or the situation is resolved. What does this mean for us? The verse speaks to a serious warning about: Disobedience: It's about disobeying God’s commands and not honoring him. Wickedness: It highlights that actively seeking to provoke God through evil or disrespect is wrong. God’s Justice: It shows that God will ultimately judge those who reject Him and cause harm to His people. Important Note: This verse describes a past event . It doesn't mean that God is angry with us right now . He is always watching over his people and has the power to punish those who are not faithful. It’s a reminder of how important it is to keep seeking Him and to live a life pleasing to him. Resources if you want to learn more: Bible Gateway: [https://www.biblegateway.com/resources/verses/2 Kings/22:17](https://www.biblegateway.com/resources/verses/2 Kings/22:17) The Bible Project - Wrath: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9q-U8Q6zE0](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9q-U8Q6zE0) (A visual explanation of the verse’s meaning.) --- To help me explain it even better for you , could you tell me: What are you hoping to understand about this verse? (e.g., "I'm trying to understand why God is so angry," or "I want to know what it means in the context of my life.")

Definition: Notwithstanding the LORD turned not from the fierceness of his great wrath, wherewith his anger was kindled against Judah, because of all the provocations that Manasseh had provoked him withal.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse together. It's a really important and somewhat unsettling passage in the Bible. Here’s a simplified explanation: The Basic Story: This verse comes from the Book of 2 Kings, which tells us about the reign of King Manasseh after the death of his father, Ahab. Manasseh was known for being a bit…unpredictable. He provoked God with a lot of sin and disobedience. What’s Happening in the Verse? “Notwithstanding the LORD turned not from the fierceness of his great wrath…” – This is the key part. The Lord didn't turn away from Manasseh’s anger. He didn’t show any mercy or forgiveness. It’s like saying, “Even though Manasseh was causing trouble, the Lord didn't abandon his anger.” “…wherewith his anger was kindled against Judah…” – This means that Manasseh’s anger started . It wasn’t a spontaneous reaction; it was fueled by his actions. “Judah” refers to the people of Judah, which is part of Israel. “because of all the provocations that Manasseh had provoked him withal.” – This is the crucial part about why the anger started. Manasseh had been encouraging sin and disobedience. He was pushing the people towards it. “Provocations” means actions or deeds that upset God’s peace. What Does It Mean? Essentially, this verse says that Manasseh's actions were a major problem for God. His anger was caused by the things he did – the provocations he instigated. It highlights a serious situation where humanity was leading the Lord astray. Important Note: This verse is often seen as a warning about the dangers of sin and disobedience. It speaks to the importance of seeking God’s guidance and resisting temptation. In short, it's a story about a king who caused trouble that ultimately angered God, and this anger led to further problems. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of the Bible verse? Talk more about what “provocations” might mean in context? Discuss the significance of this event within the larger story of Israel's history?