👉 And David smote Hadarezer king of Zobah unto Hamath, as he went to stablish his dominion by the river Euphrates.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Chronicles 18:3. It's a really important and somewhat dramatic passage about a conflict in ancient Israel. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: This verse tells us that David, a powerful king, was stopping to kill Hadarezer, the ruler of Zobah (a region near modern-day Syria), as he was on his way to establish a new kingdom – a place where they would control the river Euphrates. Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “And David…” : This establishes who is involved - David, a hugely important figure in the Old Testament. “…smote Hadarezer king of Zobah…” : “Smote” means to strike someone with a blow – here, David was deliberately attacking Hadarezer. "King of Zobah" tells us he was the ruler of that region. "...unto Hamath..." : This is where it gets interesting. "Hamath" was a city near the river Euphrates. So, David was going to attack Hadarezer in Hamath, which was a strategic location. "...as he went to establish his dominion by the river Euphrates." : This is the key part! David wasn't just attacking him randomly. He was doing it because he wanted to conquer and control that important river. Establishing a “kingdom” meant controlling that region, which would give him power and influence. What’s the Big Picture? This verse is about: Conflict and Power: It shows that David was determined to gain power and establish his kingdom – a big deal in ancient times. Strategic Location: The river Euphrates was incredibly important for trade, travel, and communication. David wanted control of this route. Divine Guidance (Potentially): Some interpretations suggest this act might be connected to God's plan for David’s kingdom – a divine purpose behind his actions. In short, it describes a strategic move driven by David's ambition and desire to establish a powerful kingdom. --- Do you want me to: Explain any of these parts in more detail? Discuss the historical context of this event?

👉 "1 Chronicles 18:3" is the phrase used to denote a pivotal moment in the Old Testament. It refers to the account of a prophecy given by the prophet Elijah before he was overtaken by the angel Elisha and his death, which involves the following verse:

"Then Elisha said, ‘Send me one of your sons as my successor, and I will give you some of my money; and if you shall have done these things, behold, it shall come to pass, that you shall hear of a man who comes out to us, and he shall be king over us, for the name of our God is everlasting.' Elisha then said, 'Why do you not fear the presence of this one, O daughter of Ahab? For I am still alive.' So Elisha said, 'Now, let my servant go to him, and send him away to eat bread; and if he shall come to us again, let me know that it is true.' The verse then states that Elisha sent Elijah away as a man of his sons (which is the term used for the prophet's successor) to deliver him from the presence of the king. The edgy or unsettling example sentence could be: "So said the Lord, 'Behold, I will give you some money; and if you shall have done these things, it shall come to pass that you shall hear of a man who comes out to us, and he