👉 And his allowance [was] a continual allowance given him of the king, a daily rate for every day, all the days of his life.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Kings 25:30. It's a pretty unusual and significant passage about how King Jehoahaz was compensated. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: Essentially, Jehoahaz wasn’t just earning money – he was receiving a constant and generous allowance for every single day of his life. Here’s a breakdown of the key elements: “His allowance” : This refers to the king’s payment to Jehoahaz. “[Was] a continual allowance given him…” : This means it wasn't just a one-time payment. It was a steady, ongoing income for his entire life. “Given him of the king…” : The king was giving him this allowance. This is crucial – it wasn’t something he earned through his own work or possessions. “…a daily rate for every day…” : This emphasizes the importance and consistency of the payment. It wasn't just a few dollars here and there; it was a fixed amount, delivered each and every day. “All the days of his life” : This is the really striking part. He received this allowance forever . It wasn’t for a limited time. What does this tell us about Jehoahaz? This verse suggests several things: Extreme Wealth & Power: The king was incredibly generous, offering him an enormous amount of money for his entire life. This speaks to a very high level of wealth and power held by the king. Absolute Dependence: It implies that Jehoahaz was completely reliant on this allowance. He wasn’t independent in any way. Potential for Abuse (Potentially): While not explicitly stated, there's a subtle implication that the king might have been manipulating him or using his wealth for his own purposes. It highlights a potential imbalance of power. In short, this verse describes a remarkably lavish and potentially problematic arrangement – a king offering an endless supply of money to his subject. --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Discuss the historical context of this passage? Explore the theological implications?

👉 Sure, let's delve into "2 Kings 25:30."

In ancient Israel, a king is known as the 2nd King of Israel. However, one day, when his son died in battle, he had to choose which son to succeed him. He chose the oldest son who was already king, and the new king would rule until he reached 4 years old. That same year, the king's son was sent away to the wilderness as a servant. As the days passed, the old king's son began feeling lonely and disheartened. He had been serving his father for many years and didn't know why he had to leave. So, one day, he left the king with a message that told him to come back. The new king was delighted at this opportunity to reign over the people of Israel. He welcomed the old son's return and promised to be kinder and more compassionate towards them than his father. The old king's son felt that he had been given an amazing gift, but not a proper one. Years went by, and the old king's son grew up and became a respected leader in the land. One day, he saw the king's message of kindness and compassion for him again. He returned to his kingdom with a message saying that he would be more kinder and compassionate towards all who had ever served him before. The people were amazed when they saw how much the old son had changed over time. Some even said that he