👉 Was he not most honourable of three? therefore he was their captain: howbeit he attained not unto the [first] three.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this passage from 2 Samuel 23:19. It's a bit poetic and a little mysterious, but it essentially means this man was incredibly important and respected. Here’s a simplified explanation: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a king who was exceptionally good and admired by his people. He wasn't just powerful; he was also deeply valued for his character. Let’s unpack the words: “Was he not most honourable of three?” – This is asking if there was anyone more honorable than this man. “therefore he was their captain” – This means he held a leadership position, perhaps as commander or leader of something important. Think of it like a captain on a ship - they're in charge and have significant responsibility. “howbeit he attained not unto the [first] three.” – This is the tricky part. "Attained" means to achieve or reach a goal. The phrase “not unto” means "not to the..." It’s saying that despite his importance, he didn't fully achieve these three things. Putting it all together: This verse describes a king who was exceptionally good and respected. He held a prominent position of leadership, but he wasn’t perfect – he didn’t reach the very top three levels of respect or achievement. It suggests that while he was a significant figure, he wasn't at the pinnacle of his people’s admiration. Possible Interpretations (without deeper context): He wasn’t always perfect: The verse might be hinting that even with great success and importance, he had areas where he could improve or wasn’t completely flawless. He was a leader of a group: Perhaps he led a specific army, a religious movement, or some other important endeavor. Important Note: This is an ancient text, and the meaning has been debated by scholars for centuries. It's a beautiful example of biblical language that conveys a sense of admiration and respect without being overly explicit about his exact accomplishments. --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Provide a more detailed explanation of why this verse is significant? Discuss the historical context surrounding this passage?

👉 The word you're asking about is "2 Samuel 23:19". It's a phrase that has been around for centuries but often gets misunderstood or misinterpreted.

Here’s how it works: - 2 Samuel (a series of books in the Old Testament) talks about a man named David who was born to an officer named Ahinoam. He grew up in a small town called Saul and served as a leader among the Israelites during their wandering in the wilderness for 40 years. One day, a group from a nearby city attacked them in their camp. - In one of these attacks, King David's father, Saul, was killed by Ahinoam’s son, Jonathan (the man who later became his brother-in-law). - As punishment, God granted the Israelites an exacting test to see if they would follow God's commands. This test was called "2 Samuel 19:3," which is a harsh and brutal version of the test. In this context, it means that a person or group will suffer more than others for their actions in comparison to others who have not committed those same actions but are later rewarded for them. It's like if you're on a mission to save people from burning houses, and you get into an argument with one of the people inside and they burn down your house instead. For example: "I heard that some students were acting out their religious duties by going to the bathroom in school without any permission.