👉 And Ephah, Caleb’s concubine, bare Haran, and Moza, and Gazez: and Haran begat Gazez.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this passage from 1 Chronicles 2:46. It's a little tricky to translate directly, but here’s the gist in simple terms: The Basic Story: This verse tells of a situation where someone – Caleb – was in a difficult position. He had two people (Ephah and Moza) who were brought to Haran, a city. And then, something unexpected happened: Ephah and Moza fell pregnant . Here’s the breakdown: Ephah and Moza: These are two women who were part of Caleb's group. Bare Haran & Moza: They were brought to Haran, but they didn't stay there. They left. Gazez: This is the key word – Gaze (meaning "son" or "descendant"). It refers to a baby boy. So, what’s the big takeaway? This verse suggests that Caleb had a child named Gazez. Context & Significance: The Exile: This story is connected to the events surrounding the Israelites' exile in Babylon (around 587 BCE). It highlights a moment of hardship and potential for loss, but also demonstrates a bit of hope – a new beginning for Gazez. A Promise: It’s a significant event because it suggests that Caleb was able to continue his family line even after the exile. In short, this verse tells us about a woman named Ephah and Moza, who had a child named Gazez, and they left Haran. --- Do you want me to: Explain why this story is important in biblical history? Provide more context about the time period it happened in?

👉 "Let's break down '1 Chronicles 2:46': It's a verse from the Bible that's not too far from our current slang terms and is often used to describe a religious or political leader who has no influence on history."

For instance, imagine being told that a man named Elijah was described as having "a great influence" over God because he "overheard" a whisper from God. This could be interpreted as "He's been influencing the course of history," which is not too far off from modern-day slang terms like "influential." In another example, when asked about a religious leader who has "no impact" on events, they might respond that someone like Pope Francis has "none to speak of" in history. This is a subtle way of saying that no one has made any significant contribution or impact.