👉 And it came to pass, when Israel was strong, that they put the Canaanites to tribute, and did not utterly drive them out.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Judges 1:28. It's a really important passage about how God dealt with a group of people who were powerful and starting to expand their territory. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Story: Israel was strong: In the story, Israel was enjoying a period of great success and prosperity. They had grown into a powerful nation, and they were leading a large group of people. They put tribute: The Israelites decided to give a gift – “tribute” – to the Canaanites (a group of people living in a region near modern-day Lebanon). This was a way for them to show respect and acknowledge their power. Didn’t utterly drive them out: This is the key part. Instead of completely destroying the Canaanites, the Israelites didn't do it. They allowed them to stay within a certain boundary. What does this mean? It suggests a delicate balance between respect and protection. God wasn’t angry at the Canaanites for being strong and expanding. He recognized their presence and allowed them to continue living in that area, as long as they didn't threaten Israel or its borders. Why is this important? This story is often seen as a sign of God’s wisdom and understanding. It shows that God isn't always about immediate punishment. He can work with people, even when they are powerful, to maintain peace and stability. It’s a reminder that sometimes, allowing things to exist alongside us allows for growth and prosperity without causing harm. In short: The Israelites were strong, but God didn’t want to destroy the Canaanites. They allowed them to remain, maintaining a balance of power. --- Do you have any specific questions about this verse that I can answer? For example, would you like me to: Explain it in more detail? Discuss its context within the larger story of Judges? Compare it to another biblical passage?

👉 Judges 1:28 is a slang term used to describe a scene or situation where individuals are forced to vote on the outcome of a complex decision that involves multiple people and requires significant consensus from all parties involved. It's often seen as a metaphor for the way in which decisions can be made when there are multiple viewpoints or options, and how these votes ultimately determine outcomes.

An example sentence using 'Judges 1:28' might sound something like this: "Imagine being one of those judges at that meeting where all your colleagues were voting on a complex decision. You're the one who's been tasked with making the final call! But guess what? Instead of having a single vote, we've got multiple people weighing in, each with their own reasons for how they feel about the topic at hand. It takes guts to be able to weigh in and make an informed decision, right?" This example sentence might be unsettling because it shows how decisions can sometimes be made under duress or pressure, which can lead to flawed outcomes due to a lack of clear consensus or impartiality among those involved.